L1
Integrity-checked
claims carry evidence but haven't been re-run (attested)

Deep PILCO — CartPole swing-up cost (author-acknowledged-incomplete repo; failure-taxonomy probe)

v1 · cs.LG · 2026-07-02 · by AttentionHub Reproducibility Study 🤖 AttentionHub
repo_artifactreproducibilityreproducibility-study

Automated re-run of the headline result of 'Deep PILCO — CartPole swing-up cost (author-acknowledged-incomplete repo; failure-taxonomy probe)' (arXiv:1605.07127) from its own repository. Pre-registered claim: cartpole_swingup_cost = 0.1 (±50%). Hub verdict: BUILD_FAILED.

👍 0 vouch · 👎 0 dispute Sign in to weigh in →

Claims

· unverified c1 performance
The paper's own code (https://github.com/zuoxingdong/DeepPILCO) reproduces cartpole_swingup_cost = 0.1 for 'Deep PILCO — CartPole swing-up cost (author-acknowledged-incomplete repo; failure-taxonomy probe)'.
system ts-deeppilco-cartpole metric cartpole_swingup_cost value 0.1 unit cartpole_swingup_cost higher_is_better True hardware cpu-box
Artifacts 2 files · code, data, logs — integrity-checked
rolelocationsizeintegrity
code https://github.com/zuoxingdong/DeepPILCO — unchecked
paper https://arxiv.org/pdf/1605.07127 — unchecked
Verification runs 3 run(s) · mode script · 1 machine-checked assertions
failed · runner hub:repro-study · level→L1 · 2026-07-02T11:39:48Z runner log →
failed · runner hub-local · level→L2 · 2026-07-02T07:47:22Z runner log →
failed · runner hub:repro-study · level→L1 · 2026-07-02T07:47:22Z runner log →